blog.frantically.org

/ˈfræntɪk/ adj. wildly excited; frenzied.

The Art of Defending the Indefensible

Anyone in either a position of responsibility or the face of the customer often has to defend policies that they may not agree with. I felt I had to share this one because of it’s great lack of ownership or ability to question the insane.

Helpdesk Hi, my name is D[hiss,crunch], how can I help?
Tim Hi, I currently have a mail redirection service and I haven’t received any redirected mail recently.
Helpdesk How do you know there is missing mail?
Tim I have a weekly subscription to New Scientist, I haven’t changed the address on the subscription and haven’t seen it for weeks.
Helpdesk Are you in possession of any missing mail?
Tim No, I moved out of my old address and no longer have access in order to check whether mail is incorrectly being delivered.
Helpdesk Without proof of incorrectly delivered mail we can’t process a complaint.
Tim So unless someone who uses mail redirection has either access to their previous address or relies on the new occupant to inform me when they incorrectly receive post, there is no way lodge a complaint?
Helpdesk Without proof of incorrectly delivered mail we can’t process a complaint.
[Extended questioning of the above]
Tim Can I have the telephone number of the watchdog that oversees the postal service?
Helpdesk Why?
Tim I do not belive the level of service for postal redirection is satisfactory.
Helpdesk The watchdog will not be able to process your complaint without a reference number.
Tim OK, can you give me the reference number of this complaint?
Helpdesk We need proof of incorrectly delivered mail to issue a reference number.
Tim Can I get the telephone number anyway?
Helpdesk The number is 0800 NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN. To remind you, they will not be able to assist you without a reference number.
Tim I’ll give it a try anyway, can I get your name?
Helpdesk I gave you my name at the start of this conversation, I am not required by law to give it to you again.

I’m sure there are many reasons that someone in the know could share as to why such a rule was put in place but the conversation above followed another one I had of similar nature:

Helpdesk Hi, how can I help?
Tim Hi, I currently have a mail redirection service and I haven’t received any redirected mail recently.
Helpdesk No problem, what is your address?
Tim XYZ
Helpdesk No problem, I’ll contact the sorting office, things should improve from here. Your reference number for this call is…

Apparently by default the sorting office do a bad job, it’s only when they get reminded to improve that things really go smoothly. Either way, I quickly changed address on anything I could think of and never received another piece of redirected mail. However, the new occupant of my old address may not have been so lucky.

2 Responses to The Art of Defending the Indefensible »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Dave | 2007/01/27 at 04:06:40

    In America, the way it is SUPPOSED to work is that the customer notifies their correspondents 4-6 weeks prior to moving or as soon as they know after that. Ideally, they notify their carrier 7-10 days prior to catch any mail they may have missed. The way it usually works in practice is the customer notifies the carrier the day prior (if we’re lucky) and will notify their correspondents “when they get around to it”. It takes delivering over 40 items to make up the cost of forwarding a single items. Sometimes the regular carrier is off and someone not familiar with a route obviously doesn’t know who lives there by name (unless it is required on the box like an apt.). Junk mail and most newsletters are not forwardable. Second class mail expires at 60 days and forwards are not renewable. In most areas the change of addresses are processed at the GMF (General Mail Facility). At our GMF 700 a day are received peaking at about 2000 a day at the very beginning and end of the month when most people are moving. Hope that can explain at least part of it.

  2. Comment by Tim Parker | 2007/01/27 at 11:22:00

    Hi Dave,

    Believe me, I’m not saying the organization of a mail redirection service is trivial. It’s more that to be able to complain about missing re-directed mail, I had to be receiving re-directed mail successfully. This seems like impossible criteria to meet!


Leave a Reply »»